Accommodating science the rhetorical life of scientific facts
But popular science is made to be like other media, so many people will enjoy it.
When scientists write about their work, first they write books and periodicals meant for the same kind of scientists to read-- scientific literature.Prelli is drawing on Thomas Kuhn, who made popular the theory of science as a series of paradigms in his 1962 .While defining paradigms and their revolutions, Kuhn says many things, and his theory remains controversial, but here are some highlights: 1.Kuhn argues that paradigms are revolutionized when someone figures out how to question the fundamentals.Wolfe-Simon described her thought process as: “So I wondered, could it be possible here on Earth that we might actually be able to find something [outside the building-block “dogma”]? Kuhn says that the questioning scientist is usually a young person (ok, Kuhn says “young man”) in the field.Nature documentaries (nature shows) are examples of popular science.
Popular science is non-fiction, so it is not the same as science fiction.
Some popular science is made by people who do not understand the subject well.
This article turns to Hansen as an important case study in the rhetoric of accommodated science, illustrating how Hansen successfully accommodated his rhetoric to his non-scientist audience given his historical conditions and rhetorical constraints.
However, no studies have explained why Hansen's scientific communication in this deliberative setting was more successful than his testimonies of 19.
Senate was an important turning point in the history of global climate change.
Popular science is also not the same as Science journalism.